Urban Day — a UWM charter — is using bribery to increase enrollment.
Urban Day, on its website, in radio commercials and in flyers (photo above) distributed in the neighborhood, is promising $100 to anyone who recommends a student who will enroll and be present on the third Friday of September.
As educators know, the third Friday is used by the state to determine a school’s funding. As many MPS teachers also know, there is a history of students from voucher and charter schools transferring to an MPS school after that third Friday count.
For years stories have circulated of private voucher and privately-run charter schools offering incentives to parents to enroll their kids – gas cards, gift cards, and even money.
But UWM’s cash-for-students plan stoops to a new low.
On its website, Urban Day has a full-page graphic of $100 bills with the headline: Refer a Student, Earn Money.” The flyer meanwhile states: “Earn Free Money!!!” by convincing people to enroll in their school.
The flyer goes on to note: “For every new student who is enrolled at school on September 19th and has you as a reference: We will pay you $100. (No limit on the number of students, but students must be present on September 19th for you to receive money.)”
Urban Day originally was a private voucher school, and for years had been touted as an exemplary community school. It became a UWM charter school in 2010.
Urban Day’s flyer did not include any information about the school’s curriculum or offerings. Nor did the flyer (or website) note that in 2011-12 and 2012-13 the school met “few expectations” on the new statewide report card — the second lowest rating, just above “no expectations.”
In 2012-13, only 8.6% of Urban Day students had special needs, compared to nearly 20% in MPS.
UWM is supposed to be the flagship public university in our city. It should be ashamed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 30, 2021 Contact: knudsonj@mtea.org
MILWAUKEE
- Aisha Carr has made it clear in recent weeks that she is unhappy with
the Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association (MTEA) for letting voters
know that she supported the 2015 attempt by Scott Walker and Republican
legislators to take over MPS schools.
Ms. Carr would like voters to forget the statements she made in an interview during her campaign four years ago in which she clearly expressed support for the Republican takeover effort, saying that “by opposing that effort, the union and district was, in essence, turning their backs on the children.”
Carr went on to say that she wanted a more collaborative relationship with Republicans in Madison.
Today,
Ms. Carr sits on the board of City Forward Collective, a private
organization that promotes Milwaukee area private charter and
voucher schools. Beyond sitting on their board, Aisha Carr has received
high dollar campaign contributions from private charter and voucher
school officials and advocates. Private charter executive Dr. Howard
Fuller likes Ms. Carr so much he gave her more than the legal amount in
2017, including a $1450 contribution funneled through the far-right
Milwaukee area chamber of commerce (MMAC). Ms. Carr has accepted more
money from Dr. Fuller this year, along with thousands in contributions
from school privatizers including Cory Nettles, Michelle Nettles, Robert
Arzbaecher and others.
We invite Aisha Carr to make her true positions clear. Ms. Carr should publicly declare if and why her past views have changed.
She should explain how she plans to square her clear affiliations with
publicly funded PRIVATE school leaders as a candidate running for a
PUBLIC school board.
MTEA believes that MPS School Board members
should be clear supporters of our Public Schools and we believe that the
voters of Milwaukee have shown that they believe the same too. We
invite Aisha Carr to come clean to Milwaukee voters about her beliefs
before election day.
Thanks to all who spoke at last night’s school board meeting on the district’s in-person reopening plan:
Jane Audette, Itinerant School Social Worker
“Dear Milwaukee Board of School Directors,
My testimony has two parts. First is
my personal reaction to returning students to school in April. Second
is my commentary on the need for my school board to hold this
administration to a higher standard.
First, investing the money to return
to school in April, with the incredible disruption to carefully crafted
routines which families in Milwaukee have created, is really
ridiculous. There are so many costs associated with this
plan that simply are not worth it for such a short time back in
school. I am not going to take time to lay out all the emotional,
financial and health consequences, as I know that you are getting plenty
of testimony which lays that out quite clearly.
Second, since the presentation was
released, I have been devastated by the anxiety and stress that has been
precipitated in MPS staff, students and families. It is truly
irresponsible for our school board to allow this administration
to put out a slide presentation to the community with serious gaps in
specificity and clarity. Perhaps the board has been provided the actual
plan, THE WHOLE PLAN, but it is unconscionable for the board to expect
MPS staff and families to testify without
full knowledge of what they are testifying about. That slide
presentation creates more questions than it answers.
I am testifying as an MPS employee and
constituent of President Miller. However, as Chair of MICAH Education,
I have witnessed innumerable times that these slide presentation do not
ever tell the entire story. With a decision
to be made of this import, I am speechless that the Milwaukee Board of
School Directors would be willing to allow the community to be, once
again, shut out as true partners in public education. The Board could
finally step up and hold this administration
accountable to the community, but I am not sure members have the
political fortitude to do so. Please prove me wrong. Demand that the
full plan be published TODAY!“
Justin Belot, Obama SCTE Teacher
“President Miller and Members of the Board:
I am a high school teacher with MPS and want to start off saying that I,
along with countless other teachers, want to be back in the classroom
with students.
However, this can only be done when it is safe and in the best interest of students.
The current Roadmap to Readiness plan, however, does not meet those two requirements.
Although teachers and school staff became eligible for the vaccine on March 1st, it is impossible for anyone to be fully vaccinated by the stated staff return date of March 29th.
CDC guidelines state that a full two weeks after the second dose is needed to be fully vaccinated.
It would be irresponsible to force staff back into buildings until the two-week waiting period concludes.
The plan, as presented, sparks more questions than answers.
There is a difference if we are planning for 5% of students returning or 90%.
Families have not had to make a choice yet, so any plans are
speculative and may require drastic changes based on the number of
students choosing in-person learning.
This is likely to be rushed to meet the timelines presented in the plan. And rushed plans are not safe.
Communication between all stakeholders is lacking or non-existent.
Staff have been provided with little to no answers from administration about procedures and safety practices.
Even worse, some have even been provided with direct information that contradicts the little information that is in the plan.
As a high school teacher, I am working tirelessly to get my students to pass their classes and earn credits.
This shift to in-person learning with only a month left in school
(for high schools on the early start calendar) will be detrimental in
that process.
Why are we even thinking about sending them back for a month?
Given that no textbooks or other resources may be used, we are
left with the same online lessons we are currently utilizing and,
perhaps, worksheets.
I see no real benefit to in-person learning other than they will now be sitting alone at a desk or table in a classroom.
We have made it this far keeping staff, students, and families safe.
Why are we throwing the towel in now? We are so close to the
finish line, but I see another surge looming. I urge you to vote no on
the Roadmap to Readiness plan.
“I am speaking tonight in opposition to the MPS reopening plan before the board. Let me tell you about how this feels from an early childhood teacher’s point of view. Every fall, I greet young children in my classroom, many who have never been to school before. There is a silent promise to parents in that moment – I will keep your child safe.
But at this moment, and with this plan, I can’t say that I can keep your children safe. I have no experience in teaching during a global pandemic. None of us do. I am creative, but I have no idea about systems to keep 32 children in a classroom distanced from each other and from me, masked, in their seats. We know this is not developmentally appropriate for young children. And may be damaging to their development.
Truthfully, this plan doesn’t mention any of these mitigations. We need specific information, assurances, protocols. Where there are holes in the system, the virus gets through. I don’t know how many children are coming. I don’t know how to change my systems for safety. I don’t know how to teach virtually and in person at the same time.
We are in a race between vaccines and variants, and we are neck and neck. Milwaukee may be orange now, but our neighboring counties are turning red, and an average of 1 person in Milwaukee has died of Covid everyday over the past 14 days. Going back will bring more cases, more deaths. This is not “a safe reopening.”
I would ask: what is the rush? Can’t we hold on for 8 more weeks and get through vaccinations?
I understand the board is under pressure, but voting yes, only shifts the pressure from your shoulders to ours, to our principals.
We don’t have the answers. We are not ready. There will be cases, there will be deaths.
So I appeal to the board to vote no on this plan. Please wait. Please slow down. We are in the home stretch! We can’t let there be even one more death. Please let me wait to greet children, when I can honestly say “I can keep your child safe.”
Andrea Dougherty, WCLL Teacher
“Dear Director O'Halloran,
I have started many of these emails this year to
the board thanking them for keeping myself and family safe but this time
I cannot say the same. I am thoroughly disappointed in not only Dr.
Posley and the Central Office Staff but the board
as well. Yesterday’s board meeting was train wreak. I am not only a
proud MPS staff member but a proud MPS parent. I’m not sure I can say
that anymore. Over this past year I have lost more friendships and
contact with family because I was that proud MPS
staff and parent. I have defended the choices made by the board over
and over again with facts and insights that only a staff member could
make. It truly disheartens me that I may need to leave the district to
be more appreciated by my board and superiors.
There are so many holes and unanswered questions that needed to be
answered to make a clear and unbiased choice. This district already has
so much inequity’s it is sickening.
1. The division between the southside schools and the
northside schools is horrible. These so called plans may work for the
southside schools but not the north and centrally located schools. Many
of the schools are already have no Chromebook
in their schools but now students are to return and leave them at home?
How is this going to work. I know for a fact that many of the
Chromebook in our building are centuries old and we have tech that comes
1 time a week. He already can’t keep up with fixing
them. So where are our students going to get Chromebook to sit in
class with if they are not bring them in? What about testing? How will
it work with the virtual students?
2. I can tell you for a fact that students are not going
to sit in an assigned seat on the bus. The students already don’t
listen to their bus drivers. So what is the consequence for failure to
listen. Not being able to take the bus. The school
I work at is a city-wide school so the vast majority of our students
ride the bus. Just last year before shut down I had several of my
students suspended off the busses for failure to comply with bus rules.
Guess what? They couldn’t take the bus they did
not come to school. They missed out on valuable instructional time.
What will happen to the students that take the city bus and miss it due
to the city bus being at full capacity with its COVID restrictions? They
will be marked absent and late missing out
on valuable instructional time.
3.. What about these virtual Wednesdays? Can staff work
from home so our buildings can be deep cleaned. I have ak5 MPS daughter.
I have no where for her to go on Wednesdays? Will I be able to bring
her work with me if I have to be in the building?
This was not addressed. I don’t have close family and no daycare will take a child 1 day a week. I checked.
4. What happens if my daughter has to quarantine? Can I
teach from home since I can’t leave a 6 year old home alone? I don’t
have close family and no daycare will take a child that has to quarantine.
5.
Are parents going to be able to flip back and forth between virtual and
in person? I can tell you in building we have some parents that will
do that. We as a district
need to improve our communication and transparency with parents. Maybe
the CO staff need to take PD on how to communicate effectively with
parents?
6. What is going to happen with the overflow kids? Our building has no extra rooms.
7.
What about the students with sensory issues and cannot keep a mask on
all day? How about the students who refuse? Are they going to be then
placed on the virtual roster?
8. What are some of the behavioral consequences? I have
several students this year that are chronic hall wanders and regardless
of consequences continue to disregard the rules.? Can they placed on
the virtual platform?
8. Are the kindergarteners taking nap? Their little bodies need that break?
9. Will staff meetings still be held virtually or in-person.
10. There was talk from CO about textbooks. I can tell
you the outdated Journey books for elementary are not the same as the
updated Journeys we are using right now. The old online version of
Journeys is no longer available online.
11. Are the virtual kids really going to sit online for 7 hours a day? That is to much without breaks like we have now.
There are so many unanswered questions! As a parent the
board and CO took my right to choose for my daughter away. I cannot keep
her home safe because I have to return to work. Don’t get me wrong I
want to see my students but safety is priority
right now.”
“Dear Board Members,
I first want to thank you in making the
best decisions for the children of Milwaukee. You have kept thousands of
students, families and staff safe. You have not succumbed to the
demands of a few but have stuck up for the safety
of everyone. I am calling on you once more to make the right decision
for our students, families and staff. This has been quite a year and a
half. Our lives and way of living has dramatically changed.
It is still not safe for our students and
staff to return to any sort of in-person learning this school year.
Even though teachers are now just beginning to get vaccinated we still
have a long way to go. Not only do the teachers
need to be vaccinated but the rest of MPS valuable staff , kitchen
workers, engineers, safety and bus drivers. How are we going to be able
to meet the needs of of students if we are short on bus drivers,
engineers or kitchen workers. I have followed very
closely with other districts and have talked to many other teachers.
This will not work with the short planning and funds to back up the
necessary supplies needed to fully insure a safe reopening. I have
school age family that have had to quarantine a number
of times this year due to coming in contact with a positive COVID 19
person at school. I even have had a family member lose a teacher to
COVID 19 this year. Do you know how hard it is to watch a child have
to deal with a lose like that when in fact it could
have been prevented by having a school board and district that cared
about their students and staff during a global pandemic? Believe me it
was not easy. As MPS staff I feel that we have been left out in the
cold on a number of things in regards to the reopening
plan. I know CO staff has a lot of decisions to make but sometimes
they forget what it is truly like in the classroom.
Next, is it really worth spending money
for 5 weeks for early start and 7 for traditional. It will be the same
as if we were in the classroom all year coming back form Spring Break.
Yes our students haven’t been in an classroom
for a year. We are dealing with a global pandemic. Safety has to take
course above all the rest. It takes a good 6-8 weeks to develop a
solid routine that students can follow. Now we are just going to throw
them back into a classroom and expect they know
how to act and what the new procedures are? No. That is the worst
possible thing to do and we are for student mental health. Just
thinking about it as an adult it throws me into a tail spin. Before
staff can teach the new procedures; they need to shown
the ropes and caught up with what has to happen as far as procedures.
Jumping from Spring Break to having kids back immediately is a
tremendously bad idea if we are headed back this year.
Yes you as a board will vote on this
issue but what time does that give staff to adequately set up their
classrooms. Staff need time to prepare to continue doing the job of two
to three teachers since we will be teaching both
in person and on the computer at the same time. There are still so many
unknown questions and answers right now. What kind of time are we
giving parent and staff to make arrangements? Looks like none. Have
parents even been notified what days would be best
for their child to be in the building if we go hybrid? The answer to
that is no. Parents and staff also need to have a say.
The media, mayor and even the
bus companies have been putting speculation out. Has the Mayor talked to
you or Central Office, how about the press or bus company. If what they
are putting out about reopening for sure
April 12th is true then last board meeting it should have been stated.
As a parent and MPS staff, I am very confused right now if MPS is
united in this. These speculations and rumors need to be addressed
immediately. A example below.
Please
make the best decision for our students, families and staff.
Thank you.”
Jacqueline Dotson-Miller, Franklin Paraprofessional
“Good
evening Superintentent Posely, President Miller and Members of the
Board and Parents…
I’m a new Para with MPS. I’m an Educational Assistant at Benjamin
Franklin. In addition, I am an EA Chairperson representing MTEA.
As working virtually is my first experience of teaching, I would prefer
to continue to work this way by choice for as long as possible. We are
not at a persistent decrease with stability with Covid-19 numbers.
All staff, students and their families will not have adequately
received both doses of the vaccine and awaiting a full two weeks after
the second dose for it to do its job of supplying immunity by a return
date within the month of April.
One Student, 1 Teacher, 1 Staff member is one too many to be put in a
position of becoming a possible casualty of this Pandemic we are in,
to date. Students can not learn from the grave. Teachers can not teach
from the grave. Going forward with plans to reopen now would cause much
disruption, and anxiety for many students and families.
I am willing to continue in my stance by allowing my voice to be heard
and felt making certain we remain virtual until its safe to return.
I have raised two outstanding MPS Alumni students, and a proud MPS
Parent.
As I have fought for the betterment of my Children over the years, I
will equally fight via voicing my concerns for the safety of our
students, my colleagues, and in making certain to remain diligent in
my efforts.
I plea to the hearers of my testimony that we not take any chances with
precious lives at stake. MPS serves the most vulnerable in our state,
why would we dare to put them in harms way?????
Allow us to remain safe and stay virtual for the remainder of this
school year. Allow this process not to be rushed , and to have more
efficient , substantial barriers in place for the overall safety of
our district. Health and overall safety shall never be rushed.
Respectfully, if your holding this board meeting virtually ….which it
is, and as you all have been for a year, don’t ask of MPS Staff,
Students and Families to do what you won’t do. Marinate on that long and
deeply.
I thank you kindly in advance for your consideration in this matter.“
Crystal Ealy, MEAA President
“I
do not support were returning to in person learning right now until all
staff have been vaccinated and inoculated and mitigations are in place
for safe learning. This past year has been a year of anxiety for some
frustration, for others, and a piece of cake for a few, all while
allowing us to maintain a safe learning environment within our homes. I
understand how hard it might be for parents right now trying to continue
to adjust their homes and work schedules to virtual learning because I
have six grandkids in MPS, which consists of two sets of twins,
six-years old and 11 years old, a 7-year old and a 14-year old so it has
not been easy for my daughter. I have experienced MPS on all levels as a
student, graduate, parent, grandparent, and employee of 28 years. This
would be a great opportunity for MPS to start a practice of being
proactive instead of reactive.”
Lorinda Flores, Fernwood Montessori Teacher
“President Miller and Members of the Board.
I am an MPS teacher at Fernwood Montessori. I am speaking tonight about Early Childhood in the Montessori schools, which hasn’t been addressed in the plan. However, what I speak about affects many early childhood K3-3rd grade.
The 32 students on my roster are 3-6 years old and my classroom is about 850 sq feet small. Half of my students sit in chairs at tables, in small groups. Montessori schools do not have seating for all of their students because the other half have spots on the floor, working side by side.
If you vote to return, and then require students to stay seated for 3+ hours, because we are fearful of spreading a deadly disease, it would be an irresponsible decision..
Montessori schools around the world have successfully returned to in-person learning during a pandemic without compromising their curriculum and pedagogy. They have done this by maxing the number of returning students at 16 so that the children can move about, work together, and use Montessori materials.
I am grateful for the proposed modification to the plan to bring back only 15-18 at a time, otherwise, it would be an irresponsible decision..
Sanitizing materials can become part of the work cycle for the 3-6 year olds. Children are able to work with Montessori manipulatives and in small groups, with everyone wearing masks.
If you vote to return, and our Montessori students can’t use the materials in our curriculum and pedagogy, and are instead sitting with chromebooks, because we are fearful of spreading a deadly disease, it would be an irresponsible decision..
Montessori curriculum and pedagogy emphasizes natural peer-to-peer social interactions in order to support unfolding social emotional development. I believe my number one job as a teacher is to keep my students safe, and to be their advocate. This includes protecting the WHOLE CHILD. Not just their physical safety, but also their social emotional well-being. It is my job to crawl under a table with a child who is scared or acting out. To hold them. To listen. To help them blow their nose if they have been crying. To clean up accidents and vomiting. I help them feel SAFE.
If you vote to return, and my tending to the 3-6 year olds’ social emotional well-being isn’t allowed, because we are fearful of spreading a deadly disease, it would be an irresponsible decision.
We all want our children back in school, but we need everyone to be safe.”
Jessica Foster, Fernwood Montessori Teacher
“I have my own ideas about returning to school, but ultimately I serve my students. So tonight I’m here for them. When they realized that under MPS guidelines they wouldn’t be able to physically work together, that they would still be getting lessons on their Chromebooks, and that they could not use classroom materials, the looks on their faces broke my heart. The fact is YES, everyone is aching to get back together in their classroom communities, but not necessarily under the restrictions of the current plan. Board Directors, have you found out how the families you represent with your vote feel about this?Is it true that classrooms will have a 15 student limit? I have 30 students. What is the plan for choosing who gets in? What happens to those who don’t? Will they be spread out to rooms throughout the school? If all of the rooms are full will they be sent to other schools?! If so, will busses be provided? Speaking of busses, are there enough? It doesn’t seem possible even with 3 tiers, and knowing what happened last year with 2 tiers, we’re in for a HOT mess! Getting back to my students, many are nervous about catching COVID and getting sick. The CDC is saying kids aren’t getting it at school. Great, so where are they getting it? From restaurants? Water Parks? Hotels? Disneyland? All of the places families will be going over Spring Break? This is when you want to return? The road to readiness is a short road, and for lack of planning it is full of cracks, sinkholes, and danger. The current plan will create a massive nosedive in the educational aspect of school. Please consider what it takes to begin a completely new educational model. Directors, if you vote for this, please be CERTAIN that MPS can deliver what is promised. Are the air purifiers going to arrive on time? I was promised a working laptop in September, I got it LAST MONTH. Our students were promised art supplies months ago. We haven’t gotten those yet.Your vote will determine the educational quality, health, and safety of all MPS students. Please make your choice with careful consideration. Our children are in your hands.”
Sarah Greuttner, MPS Nurse
“President Miller and Members of the Board. I am testifying tonight against the reopening plan. As parent and employee, I am disappointed by this reopening plan. A March 29th return date for staff is not acceptable or safe. The school I work at currently has 2 positive cases of COVID. Not to mention the fact that this plan continues to have many holes and leads to questions that can’t seem to be answered by this board or this district. I as a parent will NOT be sending my child back to school because you have not proven to me that it is safe or worth disrupting his routine. I sent in written testimony with 86 questions, I dare to ask a few tonight. Why were Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association and other stake holders being left out of the health and safety committee meetings held by Jennifer Smith since October-is that because the district would rather speak to nurses who sit behind a desk instead of those with boots in the building? Do they not value to the MTEA and stakeholders’ input? You stated a nurse in each building-do you have nurses hired to have a nurse in each building every day? Or are you playing with words and considering a half day, consult nurses etc. as a nurse “in the building?” You mention HEPA filters for every classroom-what about HEPA filters for nurse’s offices-where sick students will be sent? You have stated classes will be capped at 15, who will teach when more students show up than anticipated? Where will they go? Who gets the teacher they are assigned to and who gets someone else? Why are teachers being told if more than 15 students show up they will just be allowed in class? Why haven’t you sent out an opt in/opt out form prior to this meeting? Why do board members get to meet virtually yet you want to stuff classrooms and schools full? Please realize that we are still completely unprepared to open. We have had a year to properly plan for reopening and instead we continue to be reactive instead of proactive. Please see this and continue to make the hard decisions. Let the families and community of MPS get fully vaccinated, plan from now throughout the summer and come back prepared in the fall. Stay safe and stay virtual”
Erin Hallinan, Bradley Tech Teacher
“Good Afternoon Members of the School Board,
My name is Erin Hallinan. I am a special education teacher at Bradley
Tech and in January, I completed my 9th year of teaching in MPS.
I just want to start by saying that I do not envy the choice you are tasked with making.
I know that Milwaukee has shown strong improvements in our spread of
COVID-19 as well as the rollout of the vaccine, and because of this, I
want to take a different approach in explaining why I oppose the opening
of the schools compared to the arguments of
some of my colleagues and the parents in the district.
This year, the school board has made the consistent choice to stay
virtual due to the health and well-being of the students and staff of
MPS as well as the city of Milwaukee. I am urging you to stay virtual
for the health and well-being of our students and
staff, but this time with a focus on the mental health of those in our
district.
To call the last 365 days a rollercoaster of emotion, would be an
understatement. We have all dealt with fear, confusion, anger, and
traumatic amounts of stress but to make things worse we have all done it
isolated from those we love. While many of us put on
a brave face day in and day out, the cracks in our mental well-being
that we have tried to repair through so many new and different
strategies have only gotten larger and more difficult to patch. I worry
that if we return we are going to see a damn burst of
mental and emotional health problems across the district. Daily, I
speak with staff who are constantly on the brink of a panic attack or
anxiety attack or just an overwhelming amount of emotions. Any phone
call I take or google meet office hours I join, I
see a teacher attempting to hold back tears because they are trying
their hardest and despite the many successes we have seen in our classes
this year, we have a constant shadow of feeling like we aren’t doing
enough and like we aren’t enough.
We have seen from countless districts and schools that hybrid learning
is a failure. If we are asked to enter into a model that we know will
fail, will only exacerbate these feelings.
We all know that in times of high stress, people lash out and make rash
decisions, and the last thing any educator wants to do is to take out
those emotions on a student. This will also be paired with students who
are going to be experiencing high levels of
stress because they just spent the last 7 months utilizing one routine
to be thrown into a brand new routine for a total of 4 weeks (at the
high school level).
If you place teachers who are already under an immense amount of
pressure, in an extremely stressful situation that has been proven to
fail across the country in rooms with students who are confused and
frustrated- you are guaranteed to see a mass exodus of
teachers before the next school year.
The final question that I would like to ask, is what do we really benefit from if we go back in a hybrid setting?
I have spoken on the mental and emotional risks, we all know the
physical risks since COVID-19 is still spreading, but what do we gain?
I can only speak to the high school level, but if we go back on April
26th, there are 3 weeks of instruction and 1 week of finals that will be
in the hybrid setting.
If students only attend 2 days per week, that boils down to 6 days of face-to-face instruction per child.
Since many of you are former teachers, you all know that 6 days is not
sufficient time to teach procedures and expectations and attempt to
build relationships with students before we have to roll out a final
exam.
This instruction has to be done while attempting to keep a group of
students who are online and watching from home, engaged in the learning.
It is not our fault that the Mayor has been working against the district and the board’s decisions this entire time.
It is not our fault that the health department has been making decisions
of safety based on what they see in private schools that are located in
new buildings.
It is not our fault that the local news misrepresented your decision at the last school board hearing for the last month.
It is not our fault that those who live in surrounding suburbs will
always look down on the decisions MPS makes, no matter what decision we
make.
So please, when you cast your vote at the next meeting, listen to those
that work and live in the City of Milwaukee and not just the voices of
the most powerful.”
Jenna Hauner, Bryant Elementary Teacher
“Good
Evening, Members of the Board. I
sent this e-mail to each of you, but I felt it was important to voice it out loud as well.I
am a K4 teacher in the Northwest region in MPS, and I do not support this “Roadmap to Readiness” being presented by the district.I
planned to testify tonight, something I have never done before, and I’m testifying because I’ve done my part already to ensure a safe school year, but the district has failed to do theirs.I’ve
adapted to online teaching. I’ve built relationships with all of my families. Despite all of the struggles and growing pains, my students feel safe and loved, even through the computer. I got the vaccine on March 1st, the very first day it was available
for us to do so, and I got my second dose tonight, right before the board meeting. I’ve done home visits, become an IT specialist, and I’ve been an emotional support for every family in my classroom.I’ve
kept my end of the agreement. And yet, the district STILL has not provided a thorough plan. They have not promised (IN WRITING) to keep class sizes low (it should be 10 max per room, but I’ll settle for 15). They told MTEA that each classroom would be provided
with an air purifier (yet, as of yesterday, my administration still only has one in the building, and it’s for our future isolation room). And now they expect us to accept a “Roadmap to Readiness” plan that is missing so many details, and because of that,
we don’t even fully understand what we are supposed to be voting for! MTEA was also not included in any of the discussions for the return to the school building, as the district promised they would be. We,
the teachers, were not asked about any of these plans. We’re the ones who have to administer all of these plans on the front lines of this school district, and you’re not even going to ask us to weigh in? It feels like a slap in the face, and it’s incredibly
irresponsible of the district to not even request our input.I
urge you to vote no on this plan, as the lives of my families both inside and outside the classroom depend on it. Thank
you.
I also sent a follow up e-mail with questions to each board member
(same email mostly, just sent individually), should I send that to you
as well?“
Ingrid Henry, MTEA Vice President
“If
given the option of in-school learning, 67% of Black families
said they would probably or definitely stay remote, compared to 23% of
whites, according to Project Ready, a Newark-based social justice
group.
“Black and brown people are seeing the COVID-19 impact at a disproportionate
rate so we can’t blame parents for thinking about the safety of their children,”
-NorthJersey.com
In
all this talk of reopening families and educators have not
been asked anything nor have they been presented with a comprehensive
plan to reopen. What would learning look like for students at home and
school? Are we being offered hybrid? Which schools will have camp? How
many students will be allowed in a class? What
mental health supports are there for families? Will food distribution
continue? Are we really bringing students back for a state test? Some
questions have been answered most have not.
This
year has been hard on children and families, but they have
done their best to make it work. This sacrifice was done to keep
children, their families, and staff safe. In the last two weeks, MTEA
had a conversation with some families across the district and the common
theme was the need for information and the desire
to be heard. MPS has not had discussions with the parent leaders of the
District Advisory Council. Families and educators must be a vital part
of planning and discussions around reopening safely. Our voices must be
heard and honored in this process. Black
and Brown families in MPS must have faith that decisions are being made
that puts the physical and mental health of our families and the
community at the forefront.
Josh Jackson, MTEA Treasurer
“President Miller, School Board Directors and Dr. Posley,I
am a proud MPS Graduate, Rufus King C/O 07, and proud 4th grade teacher
at Neeskara Elementary School. I will spend the bulk of my two minutes
discussing the inequities that this plan will result in, but I cannot
emphasize how disrespectful, under the original plan, it is to give the
educators in this district who are parents only 11 days to find adequate
childcare. It was inconsiderate and appalling that it was an
afterthought for the board. As I have learned over the past few months
as a parent to a almost 1 year old, daycares will not just save spots
and, to spring this date, on us in that manner is disappointing.The
plan administration has brought forward is clear that had no educators
who have been actively teaching virtually for the past 130 school days
and the last days of the 2019-2020 school year were on the planning
team. In the classroom that I teach we have created an environment that
requires learning and has had rigorous teaching. The fact this plan
insinuates that F2F instruction is needed to make up for the ‘learning
loss’ is an insult. Everything that was presented tonight has this
belief that our children have not been receiving an education while
virtual. We will be uprooting routines that are well founded and
concrete and create uncertainty and recreate routines. Let alone will we
be now forced to prioritize between either in-person students or
virtual knowing that what works for one, does not work for the other. If
we are honest with our families, some will make a choice to risk their
lives and the lives of their families because of a perceived educational
benefit of being in person. We must be honest that not only is it
unsafe for us to return to schools, but we will be increasing the
inequity within our district. We are discussing making a dramatic change
for 37 school days when any teacher will let you know it takes that
much time to get into a groove with all the procedures and routines. Let
us make the right choice and not risk the lives of our students and
their families in a trial-and-error manner and stay virtual for
remainder of the 2020-2021 school year.“
Jane Konkel, Hampton Parent Coordinator
“Good Afternoon School Board Directors.
Families, students, and staff appreciate your efforts in keeping us safe
for the past year. You have some weighty decisions ahead of you and I
don’t want to take up too much of your time, but I want to share some
very real safety concerns.
I’ve been reporting to my school building each day since the
beginning of the school year. As Parent Coordinator, I’m responsible for
handling Chromebook distribution and exchanges. I’ve engaged with many
more families this year than ever before. That’s
one of the “silver linings.” They also have many questions and
concerns, which will likely go unaddressed in a
too late
survey.
Will a survey honestly address the conditions that their children will
be returning to, if we return to in-person learning?
Not only do classroom temperatures reach 90 degree + temps, there
is not adequate ventilation in the building where I work. Most of the
windows do not open, or the effort to open them takes herculean
strength. When we are able to get one open, it only
opens 4 - 6 in. The outline of the plan says that classrooms will have
windows. I want you to help ensure that windows in all classrooms do
indeed open. I’m 6 ft. tall, and I need to get up on a chair for the
right leverage. Please, visit some schools and
see for yourself. Try to open a few windows, look for those air
filters, and check out the bathrooms. Until adequate ventilation is
addressed, no one should return to these buildings.
As for the portable filters for each classroom, my principal said
we have one. I have not seen it. I’m concerned for the safety of our
children and my colleagues. I’ve already been threatened with monitoring
the sick room. Curious, who will attend to my
other duties when I’m covering the sick room? Or what will we do when
parents can not or do not pick up sick kids, or they send their sick
children to school. Perhaps Central Office Administrators - regardless
of licensure - could cover these rooms? I understand
they are willing and available to offer support.
There are many questions about how lunch will work. I saw
conflicting information in the plan. People will be eating indoors
without masks and this is worrisome. I haven’t eaten indoors with anyone
outside my household in more than a year. Suddenly this
will be expected, if we return to school this spring. I intend to
suggest we eat outdoors, but I’m quite sure that suggestion will be shot
down. Waiting until Fall to return to school buildings, when more
family members will be vaccinated, seems wise.
In a business where children ARE our business, we seem to have such
little regard for them. Our youngest learners will need weeks to adjust
to school and new routines. Not sure how those masks are going to stay
on or how they will stay distanced from their
peers at school and on the bus. Their developmental needs are not a
consideration in this plan. Getting kids outdoors, lots of art, music,
phy ed and SEL needs to be our priority whenever we return to school -
not testing and “academic rigor.” I hope the developmentally
appropriate needs of our youngest, oldest and special needs students
are a consideration of you and the other Directors when examining this
plan.
I question the need for High School students and staff to return at
all this school year. It seems like a huge expense and a huge risk.
Staff should not be required to report back to buildings on March
29th. This date was pulled from nowhere and it is inconsiderate to
expect that our employees with children can find childcare in a few
days. Not all of us will be fully vaccinated by that
date, so again this is a huge safety concern. If MPS expects to attract
and retain staff, demanding a premature and unwarranted return is no
way to go about it.
I can only speculate that part of the reason for this rush to
return is to get kids through tests, and this is disturbing. I know
funds are at stake, but so are the lives, health, and well being of our
students, families, and staff members. Please make
the decisions as if money was not part of this equation. The political
pressure must be tremendous, but I urge you to stand strong and do right
by the city of Milwaukee. MPS and our caring School Board could be a
model for the rest of the nation based on decisions
made this evening.
Three more “silver linings:” Bucket Drums, Milwaukee Art Museum Art
Bags, and “Fresh Produce Thursdays.” Love that kind of innovation.
Hopefully more innovation to come”
Elizabeth Kosmach, Whittier Teacher
“Good
Evening, I do not agree with the so-called outline, I mean plan
administration has shown tonight. It is not safe or smart or thought
out. .President Miller you brought forth policy that would have all
stakeholders at the table for this plan and MTEA was left out of all
healthy and safety meetings since the fall. They left out the voices of
workers who are on the front line. Real teamwork there.
As a special education teacher, I am alarmed that there was one
sentence mentioned about special education services. BUT don’t worry
parents sports got it’s own slide before special education who services
over 14,000 students of MPS. Priorities.
Also, I feel this plan was created to cater to a certain subgroup of
parents and historically when MPS did that in the 90’s that is how
School choice started and we are still fighting that battle. Parents
needed to be surveyed way before this meeting, before this plan came
out. What happens if a whole class of 36 students wants to come back, do
we throw out the cap, I hope not because that isn’t safe. Would there
be a lottery on who can come, who knows because it’s not in the plan.
Do parents understand in real time students will be on a chromebook in a
classroom with a mask on, nothing is changing except the setting and
masks. There is no real time PD in the world in how to teach engaging
lessons to both a screen and students at the same time, we are not a
superhero but a teacher surviving a global pandemic. We are not going
back to the same teaching like before the shutdown because it’s not
possible. But of course MPS wouldn’t tell parents this.
There is so much pressure from politicians,DPI and the health department
but also the media. I’m sorry but the administration needs to do a
better job correcting the fake news that goes out. Because educators are
on the frontline answering parents’ questions that they hear from the
news and well most of the time they aren’t correct and we have to tell
them the real facts. or educators are looking dumb because we have no
clue what’s going on.
In order to get a proficient plan, we need a plan with more than just a
topic sentence but one with well thought out details from all
stakeholders. Do Better MPS”
Monica Lopez, Clement Avenue
“Good Evening, I have many questions as a parent of two MPS children and as an educator. However, tonight, I am speaking on behalf of common concerns from Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association early childhood educator cohort. It is our district’s responsibility to provide structure for successful and safe environments. On the surface to an outsider, the plan may appear to be detailed, but as a staff member we understand the presentation and its lack of direction. The majority of early childhood students are slated to return to school first, even with Director Miller suggestion to move the start day back it does nothing to support Early Childhood students.First – MPS district re-opening plan does not address our Early Childhood Students.Early childhood education is kindergarten through 3rd grade.Second –Staffing early childhood students is not addressed in MPS district re-opening plan.Traditional child development requires a lot of scaffolding and close proximity of an adult, under 3 feet and with multiple adults for support during all parts of the day with activities are planned, implemented, and staffed in increments of 2, 5, 10, 15 minutes. Every school year, at building levels we try to reduce students in lunch and playground but come up against inability to reduce students numbers because of staffing shortages. The CDC still requires adult to be socially distanced 6 feet from studentsThree – Early childhood Academics are not addressed MPS district re-opening plan Early childhood academics requires, manipulatives, movement, physical interaction with peers and adults, routines for rest (important to understand students resting are doing so without masks), play, recess, toileting, and sanitation for all these components, creating issues separate from other age groups. It is hands on learning. Fourth – Planning for our Early Childhood Students is not addressed In MPS district re-opening.In a traditional year two days of 1.5 would be adequate however we are not in a traditional year. Early childhood education is intricate and detailed by nature and the current plan isn’t providing adequate information for staff. The majority of early childhood students are slated to return to school first, Covid health and safety protocols put nearly all of our practices out of complianceIn summary, The administration must work with staff at all levels and disciplines, early childhood, special ed, Montessori, etc. to sufficiently address concerns prior to our two-day professional development. MPS’s own Frog Street curriculum k3/k4 begins each day with a student greeting and commitment called a “safekeeping ritual”. Educators introducing their job as Safekeeper, stating everyday: My job is to keep you safe.I implore the School Board, and Administration to use information gathered tonight as building blocks. We have a lot of work ahead and give us the tools to keep our students and by extension community safe. Thank you.”
Amber Mahaffey, Milwaukee German Immersion School Teacher
“Dear Board members,My name is Amber Mahaffy. I am an early childhood special education teacher and I have spent my life advocating for my students and their families.I want to start off by thanking you for keeping our staff and families safe so far during this pandemic. What I can’t understand is why you want us to re-enter the buildings before we have even had our second vaccine and are not immune to COVID19.I get my second vaccine on March 31. I will not have my immunity by March 29th. As a single parent. I am in shock at this reckless and haphazard plan. Not to mention offended that I have to now get a form, disclose my medical conditions and have my family practitioner check a list saying that I am at risk.1 in 4 Wisconsinites have pre-existing health conditions that make them at a higher risk. Not only I am at risk but my daughter who is 14 is at risk. I have already rushed her to the ER three times because her asthma was acting up, she was coughing and coughing until her little lips turned blue. She had to see a respiratory therapist two of the times. This fall, there wasn’t a respiratory therapist to treat her. They were all busy treating COVID19 patients. I can’t imagine what would happen if my daughter got COVID19. Yet your reopening plan does not allow employees to protect their family members. We are only allowed to stay home and teach at home if we ourselves have a pre-existing health condition.As a single mother, I am all my daughter has. Yet, I am perhaps one of the luckier MTEA members as I won’t have a problem getting my physician to fill out my form to stay at home due to my personal increased risk for death from covid19. So I can protect myself and my child. But I stand united with other MTEA members who have family members who are at incredibly high risk. We should all have the chance to stay home until our loved ones can also receive vaccines. What can be gained from disrupting the students routines the last few months of school? Nothing at all.What happened to a solid hybrid plan? One that has gating criteria and allowed us to ease back into in person teaching. Did you even survey the families to see how many children and families would be returning to in person?What about our special needs students? Most of them have lots of preexisting health conditions and facial tactile defensiveness that makes wearing a mask next to impossible. Let me explain what tactile defensiveness looks like near a student’s face. A child sees something coming towards their face. It could be a pair of sunglasses, a scarf to keep them warm in the winter, or a facemask. Yet to a student that has facial tactile defensiveness, that mask is like a huge stinging murdering hornet that will send them into anaphylactic shock or kill them. The smell, the texture and the colors of the mask all cause them to go into fight or flight mode. They grab, swat, and hit in response to things that they are tactically defensive with. To that 4 year old austic child a facemask is a murdering hornet. Then there is the concept of space. My students don’t have a concept of 6 feet or 3 feet or whatever the CDC latest whims are.Don’t even get me started on our new commissioner of health Kirsten Johnson. She previously worked as a director of Washington Ozaukee County Health Department.As of three days ago Washington Ozaukee County has the highest COVID19 caseload in the state. Their firefighters and EMT’s are working overtime trying to provide citizens with a high quality of services while battling COVID19. Kirsten Johnson learned nothing in Washington Ozaukee County and she plans on fully opening up Milwaukee with little regard to the first responders, teachers, health professionals and citizens here.We cannot let Milwaukee become Washington Ozaukee County, Italy or Europe. We must learn from others. History cannot keep repeating itself. It must stop now. The political motive to open up has come with a great cost to schools in Italy and Europe. Now they a real closed down again due to children getting sick from the new variants. What happens when these variants get brought home to my students’ parents? Will they lose their jobs when they have to quarantine for 10 days or will they be forced to still work spreading the virus potentially all around. Our children are the future. They are the future firefighters,police officers, political leaders, teachers, presidents and vice presidents. We cannot let them down.We owe our students and families better than this. My students and their families deserve a well thought out plan like schools in the 53151 zip code. We might not have the funding, we might have older buildings. But we do have some of the most intelligent, creative and passionate people. It is time to invite all groups’ parents, MTEA and board members to work together for an inclusive agreement that is respectful to families, staff and the community. Thank you for your time. Respectfully.”
Jesse Martin, James Madison Academic Campus Teacher
“President Miller, members of the board, I am speaking tonight against the proposed plan to return to school in person. I’m a proud MPS high school English teacher. And while I’m glad to see so many of my colleagues getting the vaccine, the general population is just now getting access to the vaccine. I’ve read the plans, I’ve listened carefully tonight, and I am not convinced that this plan will adequately mitigate the risk of students spreading the virus to one another and then to their families. As a teacher, my first and most important priority is that my students are safe. This plan would put me in a position where I wouldn’t be able to keep my students and their families safe. This school board has done the right thing over the past year despite considerable political pressure to unsafely reopen in person. I understand that the pressure is mounting from every direction, and I believe that some - and I want to emphasize some - of that pressure is well-intentioned - it has to be. But that does not mean it is any less imperative that we protect our students and families at all costs. Just one more time, for emphasis: no matter what anyone says, there is nothing as important as keeping our students and our families safe. By staying virtual over the past year, the board has kept students and families safe and has saved countless lives. In fall, when it’s projected that every adult will have had ample opportunity to get the vaccine, we will be in a considerably better position to consider opening in person. I urge the board to not send us back as long as it’s unsafe. Thank you.”
Jennifer Mueller, Neeskara Paraprofessional
“Good evening,
I am writing to you as a parent and an MPS employee. When it
comes to reopening in april I personally don’t think it should happen.
As a parent how are these children going to keep masks on? They will
not be able to do anything normal. Lunch would
be in the classroom specialists would be affected. It is not healthy
for these kids to be secluded in one classroom all day. My son has
asthma and being in a mask in a building that is not very well
ventilated will not be good. I understand these kids
need to be in school, however my son’s school which is Mgis goes above
and beyond for their students. They get the materials they need and
work is still being done and submitted daily.
The employee side of me. As a paraprofessional. We can not
spread the children out 6 feet apart even hybrid. Not all staff will be
vaccinated. I for one can not currently get the vaccine because of
allergies. As an employee there is no good that
will come out of this. Bussing is another! Will we have enough
bussing? Also why would high schoolers start about 3 weeks before they
are done anyways makes no sense! I could go on and on. Please really
reconsider this plan. Keep us virtual, let’s start
fresh in September. Give the schools all summer to get up to where
they need to be safe etc. The variants are out and we have no idea if
the vaccine will even cover those or how long the vaccine will even last
in one’s system. Why take kids out of their
daily routine now since we are only months away from the year being
done. Thanks for reading my email and I truly hope you take this into
consideration.”
“Good afternoon Erika,
My name is Jenni. I am emailing you as a parent and an
employee. First off as a parent my son goes to Milwaukee German
Immersion fantastic school fantastic staff however I am not comfortable
with him going back. He has anxiety and adhd he can not
sit in a building that isn’t well ventilated with a mask on all day.
These kids have more to do at home in their neighborhoods than they
would get in a building. There they have to stay in their classrooms
all day, eat lunch there etc . That is not fair
to them. My son is thriving on virtual. I understand the importance
of them being in person but it is not safe in my eyes.
As an employee I work at Neeskara which I love but in the
classroom I am in we have 7 tables where we can not distance 30 kids
safely. I have allergies and I can not get the vaccine due to that so
then I am put at risk with my asthma going back into
a building. I personally think we should start fresh in September
where most of the general public will be vaccinated and a few months
closer to the kids being able to get the vaccine. Mps has done great
job this far with this whole virtual why interrupt what
the kids are use too besides when they are scheduled to go back that is
enough time to get them settled in etc then school is over makes no
sense.
I really respect the school board and how they have done this far
and I hope they make the right decision. To be honest that parent that
spoke at the last board meeting from mgis and wants these teachers to
go more above and beyond I do not think there
is any way for them to go higher than what mgis staff is already
doing. A few staff members took this parent as a slap in the face.
This pandemic has changed a lot of things and these parents are all
about the sports you know what even if we were in person
there may not be sports anyways the rec department already said
indefinitely cancelled. Just wanted to email you personally. I did
send an email to the board goverance too. Thanks for all you do
concerned parent and employee.”
After Meeting Email
“Good very early morning!
I just want to say I am disappointed in the board tonight! I
have a son with asthma, allergies, adhd, and anxiety who can’t handle a
mask for more than a half hour! Yes their is a virtual option however
me being a para in mps I do not
get the option to keep him virtual so how is this fair? I am not able
to get the vaccine due to medication allergies I also have asthma and
allergies. I can’t handle a mask for more than 2 hours at most! You
guys have made my decision to pull my son from
milwaukee public schools! No consideration for staff!! What about
the staff who do not have access to daycare for the 12th and 13th? Can
we use sick time? As a para I can’t afford to pay daycare! I would
need a 2nd job to pay just for daycare! What
about Wednesdays do staff get to stay home too? That is another
daycare day! Can mps pay daycare for staff members? This plan is
unsafe, rushed, and non sense. Shame on you for feeding into their
political aspect! I respect the board members who said
no thank you that was smart! Please answer my questions mainly what
does staff do with their own k-3rd kids that don’t go back til
Wednesday? Who is paying for their daycare needs? What about people
that do open enrollment is a bus option feasible for
them? Bussing from another public school is that an option? I need
answers or you will lose both my son and myself! I am so hurt, confused
etc to the point I am crying over this ordeal! You put a lot of us in
a predicament that can’t be fixed as quick
as you can put all these kids into a school building. Daycare have
caps on them not all kids can get a spot! Please reconsider the
plan. It is not safe!!”
Amy Mizialko, MTEA President
“Administration is not being honest with themselves. MPS does NOT have the staff necessary to cover overflow classrooms. How could they? They don’t know how many students are returning and MPS hasn’t had a full pool of Substitute teachers in a decade. MPS cannot rapidly process staff requests for medical accommodations. I will remind you that during the last week of in person instruction, MPS couldn’t achieve the barebone basics of soap and paper towels in all bathrooms.Administration is not being honest about the choice families actually have - which is – instead of students logging in safely from home continuing the routines and learning consistency teachers and families have worked so hard to create, that “in person” instruction will simply mean that students will travel on a bus with no social distancing, where mask wearing can’t be enforced, and log in on the same chromebook in a desk that is taped off from peers and teachers, where they will soon be told to take a standardized test.I’ve never heard more administrators repeat over and over again tonight that they have collaborated with MTEA. Administration DID NOT include MTEA to participate in safety reopening workgroup meetings. Administration made a choice to EXCLUDE the union that represents the vast majority of workers in this district. That wasn’t a miscommunication, mistake or misunderstanding. Leaving MTEA and workers out was a calculated decision. MTEA members will not be forced into buildings on March 29th - we will not be inoculated by March 29th. MTEA values and takes seriously the safety and health of our students, families and workers. MTEA will not stand for a haphazard, incomplete, throw the doors open and hope for the best approach, and neither should this board.”
Alyssa Molinski, Starms ECC Teacher
“Good afternoon, Milwaukee Public School Board of Directors
My name is Alyssa Molinski, and I am a first year MPS teacher. I teach K3 at Starms Early Childhood Center.
I write to you today to express my frustration with the proposed
reopening plan. I have included my main reasons & questions below.
The plan doesn’t allow teachers to be
fully vaccinated before being forced to re-enter the school building. My
second vaccination is scheduled for next Wednesday, and I signed up to
be vaccinated immediately - as soon as it was
available to MPS teachers. I request that teachers who signed up to be
vaccinated as soon as possible should have the chance to have both
vaccinations & the two week period after the second vaccination to
allow the vaccine to become effective. Setting up classrooms
the week after spring break & inviting students back the week after
that seems much safer to me. Additionally, anyone who traveled over
spring break will have time to be able to be tested/notice symptoms of
COVID-19 before they are invited into the school
building.
I am confused as to
how many students I will have in my classroom each day. My classroom
has two tables in it. How many students will be sitting at these two
tables when I have a class of 25 students? Is my class going to be split
into groups, or will I have my whole class each day?
I
have a morning class and an afternoon class. I teach half day K3. I
NEED cleaning staff to sanitize my classroom between my morning class
& afternoon class. It would not be safe to invite a whole new class
into my classroom after
the AM student’s day comes to an end. How will you ensure this happens?
Will
3 & 4 year old students be expected to sit in 1 chair, on a
Chromebook, for the whole day that they spend in my classroom? This
proposed plan doesn’t include ANY information about what the in-person
experience would look like
for our early childhood students.
I want my students to
feel happy & safe when they enter my classroom. I can say with
confidence that this plan does not consider my students’ well-being or
safety. I want a plan that includes feedback from teachers
& families - the people who know what’s best for students.
Thank you for your time!”
Karen Olson, Escuela Vieau Teacher
Oral Testimony: “I am against the districts proposal to return at this point.
As a parent how am I supposed to make an educated decision this
week whether I should keep my children virtual or send them back face to
face?
This plan is lacking details of how either will work. We have been
very cautious this year to protect ourselves and our children. I am not
sending my children back to be guinea pigs while they figure it out. The
teachers have no more information
about the plan and how things will work because the district has failed
to prepare them ahead of time. There is no way they can be fully
prepared with only a week of professional development while also being
expected to teach, plan, help students, set up classrooms,
and prepare for student return.
My children’s teachers have worked incredibly hard this year and
have done an amazing job at setting up routines and making them feel
successful. I can’t imagine that being upset at this point in the year
for less than 2 weeks.
I also will not send them back just to have weeks of testing crammed in!
No one can answer questions about how virtual or hybrid will work
exactly. What happens if there are more than 15 kids in a room? If sent
to overflow rooms who will teach them? Why would I want my children in a
room with a different adult than
the one they have grown to trust this year? What if we don’t feel safe,
can they switch back to virtual?
What about virtual, will they just be watching the teacher teach?
Will they still get small group time and office hours for help? Will
they be left to just watch videos and figure it out?
My daughter is in 7th grade and has anxiety. She has been a nervous
wreck since this plan has been released because it doesn’t give enough
information and leaves way to many questions and unknowns. We told her
she could stay virtual and she
asked me “but what if I don’t learn what I need to because my teacher
will be teaching the in person kids?” No kid should be put in this
situation.
A clear detailed plan should have been released weeks ago. The
district should have held listening sessions where they could answer
questions and get feedback from staff and parents. Staff should have
received training on what to plan for and
what to expect and then could have gone over it with parents if they
had questions. Then if you voted to return we all would have been able
to make an educated decision on what’s best for our families. And if you
voted to remain virtual we would have been
able to be prepared for fall. But now, with this shell of a plan, we
are being asked to make a decision with little to no information.
Don’t allow them to play politics with our students and let’s continue to work to keep them safe!”
Written Testimony: “The lack of communication from the district and board about school reopening has created a lot of confusion among staff and parents. Staff are getting questions about what reopening would look like from parents and we are unable to answer any of their questions because we know nothing except what is in the shell of a plan the district released last week. There wasn’t even the courtesy of sending the plan to staff for us to view or be aware of the possibility that we may return as early as March 29th. This lack of communication has created a lot of unnecessary anxiety in children, staff, and students because no one knows what to expect. Teachers have many many questions. It takes time to absorb the new information and plan how to execute that in our classrooms. There has been NO information given to staff and most disturbingly administrators were told to NOT start planning for a return until after the board meets. Why is this? PBIS and other teams could have started to plan procedures for their schools. Even if it was determined we would not return those plans could have been used for a return in fall. I have compiled a list of questions that many staff are asking so you can see just how incomplete this plan is and how many questions staff have. Staff are anxious because we have no idea what to expect or how to plan.1) If the board votes to return school teams will now have very little time to meet and plan especially considering spring break is approaching. Will they be paid for meeting outside of school hours? When will they be given time to present what they plan to staff in regards to routines for morning arrival, dismissal, bathroom routines, lunch routines and procedures, etc?2) Why are staff returning before many have had their second shot and before the waiting period before the vaccinations are fully effective? 3) If it is safe for us to return why are you still meeting virtually?4) What is being done in regards to the concern with the variants now in Wisconsin and the data showing it affects children more than the original strain?5) If we are hybrid with different groups on M/T and W/Th will staff members students be able to attend all 4 days? Some of our staff(Paras, CHAs, and other staff) do not make enough money to pay for daycare especially if not getting 40 hours a week. 6) If we do two a week hybrid what about students who rely on camp/CLC 5 days a week? Will that still be available? 7) Will before and after school camps be available day 1 and will their enrollment be expanded? Parents who work can not go without this.8) Do buildings have enough bandwidth to support this? In past years when there has been all school testing there are many technology issues.9) How will the district ensure that ALL parents respond to if they are returning or staying virtual? If parents don’t reply to a survey what is the plan? We can’t have them just show up day 1 without knowing how many will be in classrooms or who is returning.10) Will high risk staff members or those that have high risk members in their household that haven’t been able to be vaccinated fully yet be able to work from home? 11) Will staff be able to work from home on Wednesdays while the building is being sanitized?12) Is the plan and the videos available to parents in all languages? 13) Many teacher laptops do not have cameras and they have been using their own laptops. Will they be provided school laptops with working cameras(chromebooks are not sufficient)?14) How does this work for open concept rooms where they don’t have separate classrooms? 15) What about families who have moved and are no longer in bussing ranges? Will they have to switch schools? That seems horrible at this point in the year and will cause issues with bussing and class lists. 16) How is it in the students best interests to return at this point in the year when routines and procedures have been established? It will take weeks to teach all of the procedures. How is that loss of learning time beneficial to the students? 17) What happens if 80-90% of students want to return in one school but only 20-30% in another school? 18) How is this going to affect parents who have to work and can’t afford to miss work when their child suddenly has to quarantine? Right now they have situations worked out for their children, many are not in the position to change things or take time off work if their child has to quarantine. 19) How is switching between virtual to F2F and back to virtual if there is exposure good for kids? 20) How is this developmentally appropriate for our youngest students? It takes a long time for young children to become comfortable and settled into routines, this does not seem beneficial to them. Parents won’t be able to escort them to classrooms, they have been home all year, some haven’t been in classrooms ever and will need to adjust, some will have tantrums and try running the building. How will all of this be addressed with staff stretched thin and maintaining social distancing? 21) Are we returning just so we can do state testing? How is this beneficial to students and their social emotional well being? It takes weeks to prepare and teach students to take the tests. This is more loss of learning time on top of the teaching of procedures. Will schools be trying to complete Forward, Star, and Access testing? This is way too much to cram into a short period of time when we should be continuing to teach and not return just to test. Cleaning and safety Supplies:22) Classrooms have not been touched since summer. Will they be cleaned and wiped down before returning? That has not happened as of this email being sent? Who do schools or staff contact with concerns when proper cleaning is not happening? 23) Have you as board members toured the buildings to see if these things are actually happening with fidelity?Have you seen the supplies given to classrooms? (I have included a picture of what classrooms have received so far…24) What has been done to improve ventilation? The plan states all classrooms with windows have had broken windows fixed. What about classrooms and offices without windows? The coatrooms and cubbies that have been turned into SPED classrooms and offices don’t have ventilation air returns or windows so what is being done about that?25) We have been told Hepa air filters have been ordered for classrooms. Where are they because they haven’t been delivered to all schools? And some schools only received a few so when will the rest be delivered? 26) Were offices and special ed rooms(small ones usually considered offices) included in those counts? What about staff who work in cubbies in hallways, will they be given Hepa filters?27) Will there be plexi glass dividers and if so where are they because no teachers have seen them in buildings yet.28) More cleaning people have been brought in but every year there are many instances where workers from the agencies don’t show up, clock in and leave, or don’t actually do the cleaning, Buildings in past years have been left in disgusting conditions and have many nights in a row with “emergency cleaning” where only the garbages are emptied. What is the plan to make sure this doesn’t happen and buildings are actually cleaned and sanitized every day?29) Are there sanitizing stations around the buildings?30) Will sanitizer and cleaning supplies be supplied to staff because in the past teachers purchased that?Class sizes:31)We are told classes will be no larger than 15 students. What happens to students if more return than 15? If they are put in overflow rooms who will teach those? How is this being communicated to parents ahead of time? Many parents would be upset if their child’s teacher changes at this point in the year or if they were in an overflow room and not with their peers and teacher who they have created relationships with this year. What happens when the school has no available classrooms or places to put overflow rooms?32) Some classes are over 40 or even 50, what is the plan with these classrooms? 33) When parents pick virtual or in person do they then have to stay with what they picked? How is this enforced? Subs:34) Is there a large enough sub pool? There are not subs available for vacancies in normal years so how will we cover classrooms now with a smaller sub pool? The plan stated 72% of subs said they would return. Many subs have said they never received a survey so who was surveyed, how many were surveyed, and how many responded? 72% is not sufficient if the majority of the sub pool was not surveyed and responded. Staffing:35) How many extra staff members are being assigned to buildings to help with distancing, lunches, coverage, etc.?36) Will more paras be in buildings to help teachers with all of the additional work for both virtual and F2F? 37) Are more support staff being hired and sent to schools? Psych, counselors, and social workers will be extremely busy helping with behaviors, Bit plans, reevaluations, and their normal duties. Now you are adding on more attendance concerns for them to handle as well as having students in buildings who need more social emotional help and anxiety issues with returning. Will they be able to provide necessary sensory materials or have calming corners that many students desperately need? Will each building have full time Psychologists, Counselors, and Social Workers?Exposure:38) If exposed will we quarantine? Will classes have to quarantine?39) How would that work; would we still teach virtually from home? 40) Who would cover classrooms if not enough subs?41) How does that look in high schools where students change classrooms and hallways are crowded?42) What happens with teachers who teach multiple classes if they are exposed? What about students who travel to different classes?43) What happens with families who have students in multiple buildings, if a family member or student tests positive how does that affect the other classrooms of the siblings? Will the schools be informed so they can monitor those classrooms/students?44) How quickly will schools be notified that someone tested positive? What happens if that student is at school? What is considered close contact? 45) How will families be notified? 46) What happens to staff who only have cubbies to work in? Some work in coatrooms that have been converted into speech, ESL, counselor offices, and SPED rooms. They do not have windows to open and are very small. What happens with those teachers? Where do they work with students if there are NO available classrooms to work in? Have Hepa filters been ordered for them? 47) How are students being scanned? 48) Will their temperatures be taken before entering the school or classroom? 49) What will be done if a student is sick?50) What happens if no parent can be reached, if they don’t have transportation to come get the child, or they say they are coming and don’t? (These instance happens ALL the time)51) Will assigned seating be required in classrooms, lunchroom, and busses to help with contact tracing?52) The school that the CDC studied used electronic badges that students scanned when getting on and off the busses. This allowed them to easily know who was in contact with students who tested positive. Is the district following this safety measure or if not what other safety precaution is being taken to know who is on busses and exposed each day?53) How are our most vulnerable and at risk students being protected? What about students with Special needs that can’t wear masks? 54) What is the procedure for sick students and staff to return to school? There are also colds and regular viruses going around, will all students and staff who are sick need a negative test to return or will they need to be out a certain amount of time? Lunches:55) How will lunches work? The plan says students eat in the lunchroom but in some schools the lunchrooms are very small so distancing would be almost impossible. 56) Some administrators are saying lunches will be in the classroom. If so who will wipe desks and clean the room after students eat? Who will cover classrooms since that is the teacher’s lunch hour? What is the district doing to ensure eating in the classrooms doesn’t bring critters; many buildings have had issues with roaches, bed bugs, and mice.57) Are snack times in classes(primarily Kindergarten) still taking place and what does that look like?58) Where will students get water during the day? Assuming they will not be able to use the water fountains, what happens because kids don’t always remember to bring water bottles?59) How far apart will kids need to sit from each other in the lunchroom?60) How will staffing work to pass out lunches to virtual students for the Stop and Go?Procedures:61) How will bathroom breaks work both for individual bathroom trips and whole class? 62) How will entry and dismissal work? Some buildings are very congested in hallways/entrances during these times?63) Again, why were schools told not to start planning this in the event that we do return?64) Some schools have 700-900 students with only 3 bathrooms for students, how will that work?65) Last year we regularly had bathrooms without soap because there was none, how can we ensure that will never happen again?66) Will students be able to use school libraries? What will those procedures look like? 67) How much of the day will be allowed for arrival and dismissal? 68) Where will students store things if they can’t use lockers?69) How are students expected to carry things home including chromebooks with no backpacks? 70) What will recess look like? Will they be able to play with equipment? 71) If teachers are being streamed to virtual students do in class students need to have media releases signed and what if they don’t return them?72) Will classroom cameras need to be on all day even when lessons aren’t being taught directly? What happens when there is inappropriate behavior in the classrooms? 73) Will teachers be able to meet with students in small groups?74) Will teachers be provided microphone systems so they can be heard both virtually and in person through their masks? 75) How do we support both virtual and face to face students?76) How do we do interventions or SRBI with virtual students while also supervising in person students? 77) Will families be asked to purchase and send supplies? Uniforms? This could be financially difficult for parents especially for such a short period of time and on short notice. 78) Are schools collecting chromebooks and who will be sanitizing them? 79) Will Paras still be able to move from classroom to classroom? How are they protected because this requires them to be exposed to many classes and students during coverage of lunch and recess?80) How do things like sharpening pencils work? Students usually do this but that would increase exposure and teachers don’t have time to do this. Bussing:81) How are 36 kids(50% according to the plan) allowed on a bus when the city buses are only allowing 15?82) What about students who take the city bus? Will there be extra busses added so students can get to school?83) If we are only putting 15 in a classroom why would we put up to 36 on a bus?84) Who will enforce bus policies and face masks while the drivers are driving?85) Will high schools still be collecting cell phones?Quarantine/Sick rooms:86) Who is staffing this? Not all buildings have nurses so who is in charge of it then? Nurses typically spend a lot of time each day giving meds to students- who will be doing this if Nurses are taking care of sick children? Surely they can’t do both.87) What happens if the sick room is full? In large schools there could be a number of kids with everyday colds and viruses. How will we be able to seperate them so they aren’t exposed in the sick room? Or if they are all sent to the sick room how many can be there at a time?88) Is staff members are quarantined who will cover classrooms if there are no subs?Behaviors:89) How will students with behaviors be addressed? Many kids both in special ed and not in special ed need accomodations for movement, time outs in other rooms, breaks to leave the room. What will the procedures be for such instances and many more that occur on a daily basis? 90) If we are doing two hybrid groups how will it be enforced who comes on which days? What happens to students who come on the wrong day? This happens frequently with Kindergarten start dates at the beginning of the year. Masks:91) How will masks be enforced? What happens to students who refuse to wear them? 92) Will parents have to sign agreements that students will wear masks or will need to return to virtual like in other districts?Specials: 93) What will time with specialists look like? Some travel to different buildings, what will it look like for them? 94) Many specialists teach on carts traveling to classrooms, will that continue?95) How are specialists who teach in multiple buildings also supposed to juggle hybrid schedules? 96) If they are assigned to a building on Wednesday then those students would only get those specials virtually while others receive it F2F. Is that being addressed?97) Can art teachers share materials? How does passing out and collection of materials work?Special Ed:98) Will special Ed teachers be able to see children from multiple classrooms at one time? 99) If not how will they be able to meet minutes in IEPs when they have multiple classrooms and grades?100) What happens with sped teachers who share classrooms?101) What about SPED teachers who don’t have classrooms and work with groups in the hallway or cubby? 102) How are SPED teachers who have to teach in close proximity sometimes feeding them or hand over hand assistance supposed to be socially distance and how are they being supported to protect themselves and student exposure?103) How will OT, PT, and itinerant teachers provide services to students in multiple different buildings while limiting exposure between buildings? 104) Are there see-through masks for deaf and hard of hearing students and staff? Are there enough to last the school year? What happens if they run out of them? Professional Development and teaching:105) Why have we gotten no information about any of the plans or procedures?106) When will we be trained about how to do hybrid and why hasn’t this happened earlier in preparation for a possible return?107) Will our focus be solely on academics or on SEL and routines? The new routines after a year of being out of school will certainly take much longer to teach and practice then the district put in the plan. 108) The plan says no materials(manipulatives or shared materials) and no textbooks, are there enough chromebooks at school for students to use? Will they carry them back and forth to school? Have chromebooks been purchased to replace ones damaged in homes? Will classrooms have extra chromebooks for students to use when batteries die or they forget chargers?109) How do we effectively teach and engage students without textbooks and materials?110) What about Montessori classrooms where all of the instruction relies on materials, will students be able to use the materials? Parents want to know what these classrooms will look like because sitting in the classroom on computers is NOT Montessori. 111) How will the district support staff in finding and creating lessons to give hands on experiences while limiting exposure and sharing materials? If they are all going to be on computers all day then what is the point of returning?112) How will staff keep track of attendance and students working virtually while monitoring in class students? 113) What supports are being given to them?114) What will Kindergarten classrooms look like? They have snack, play with toys, use materials and manipulatives. How will those procedures and activities happen?As you can see there are many questions that have gone unanswered, these aren’t even all of them. If a full detailed plan had been released earlier than these things could have been addressed. Asking staff to return in less than a week and students in less than 3 weeks(one of which is Spring Break) is unacceptable with the lack of planning and professional development. Putting all of the professional development into one week while teachers are still teaching, planning, and setting up their classrooms to meet distancing guidelines is unimaginable. Even without an exact date for return we could have started to meet within our buildings to plan for school specific routines, professional development could have been offered to show us how to teach both hybrid and virtual together, and collaboration could have happened between schools, the district, and staff to plan for many scenarios left out of the plan. Instead, we have heard nothing nor seen a complete plan with details staff desperately need to know. The most important question:How are parents supposed to make an informed decision with so many unanswered questions that not even the teachers who have built relationships with them can answer?”
Laquita Pryor, Milwaukee Sign Language CHA
“Good evening…..my name is Laquita Pryor.I have been employed with
the district for over 10 plus years now.I am also a proud mother of six
kids that attended MPS.I believe that it would be in the
student’s,staff,and their families and community’s
well being and best interest to remain virtual until next school
year.Why? One may ask.The COVID cases among school age kids under 18
years of age is on the rise…..which increases the chances of
teachers,staff,and their family members either contracting
or and dying from COVID.Waiting until the Fall would also allow for the
schools to be properly cleaned and sanitized,PPE put in place and air
purifiers and proper ventilization put in every room.This time frame
would also allow for staff and other community
members such as grandparents, parents,and other family members that may
be more prone to contracting COVID become immunized against the
virus.Thank you for your time…..
“
Jodie Schauer, Hamilton H.S. Librarian
“Dear MPS School Board Members,
As a teacher in MPS, the district’s reopening plans are
shameful. There are so many overlooked things to reopening safely, that
this “plan” must be a joke. First of all, where is the hybrid schedule?
So we go from fully virtual to all-in, like
everything is ok and safe? It’s not yet. Teachers aren’t fully
vaccinated, and neither is the community we’re trying to protect. Our
students live in multi-generational homes quite often. The districts
plan is putting our community at risk, when there are
the variants starting to circulate. Our buildings are often quite old,
and don’t even have air conditioning or working windows. The HEPA
filters to each classroom will be useless. Our class sizes, especially
in the high school, are around 40 per class. How
in the world do they expect enough room and coverage to split those
classes into 3 parts? The 15 students per class sounds wonderful, but it
can’t happen.
Any district that has reopened has an actual plan for
contact tracing, which involves assigned seating everywhere, even the
cafeteria. This plan offers nothing of the sort. Also, if teachers will
have to teach in person and virtual at the same
time, how will this actually happen? Our buildings often don’t have the
wifi bandwidth for full virtual instruction. Since the schedules won’t
be modified, are we really expecting our virtual students to look at a
computer screen for the entire day without
ANY interaction with their teacher and class? This is unhealthy for
our students. Also, how will teachers actually do this? There has been
no training, and there is no equipment to make this happen beyond
Chromebooks. Why weren’t parents and guardians surveyed
before this plan was designed? Many have said they will not return
until it’s safe. Let’s talk about lunch. In elementary schools, it’s
possible for students to eat in the room. In high schools, this
impossible. Lunch will be a potential super-spreader event
every day. How will schools monitor bathroom use? Passing in the
halls?
I could go on and on with the holes left in this “plan”. I
hope that as a Board, you will stand up for our school community and
require a better plan. One that takes into account reality. The current
reopening plan is dangerous and insulting
to you as a Board, MPS teachers and staff, and our community.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns.”
Ben Ward, MTEA Executive Director
“MTEA has advocated for many of our safety measures and mitigation protocols through the various stages of this pandemic. Without compromising in our advocacy for the highest standards of safety, we have partnered with MPS, participating in regular discussions, in workgroups, labor-management committees, meet and confer and so forth. We also advocated for more support from the State and City governments for MPS.But let me be clear: suddenly MTEA was excluded from critical discussions over the past month about this so-called plan. MTEA somehow was uninvited to the health and safety protocols work group this month and this presentation was never discussed with MTEA in any venue before the day it was released to the public. This summary presentation creates a list of questions longer than it is. A presentation should summarize an ACTUAL PLAN. Administration used the word “rigor” to describe instruction, yet they didn’t impose that standard on their own work product. I am speaking tonight to convey the anxiety, frustration and anger of the members of MTEA, the workers who make this district run, at the lack of a solid, detailed plan that gives staff, students, and families the answers that they need. There is ample pressure to reopen but the real pressure that this Board has on it tonight is to reopen SAFELY during a pandemic that is NOT OVER before we can confidently welcome students back.The devil is in the details and by devil, I mean COVID. Our members will have, for the most part, had an opportunity to be vaccinated but our students and families have not for the most part. Children do catch and transmit COVID, at higher rates than previously thought, and any plan must ensure that MPS is not the cause of outbreaks and unnecessary illness.Directors Miller and O’Halloran’s motion is a push in the right direction, but families, students and staff deserve a real, written comprehensive plan based on actual student numbers that they can consult for answers with an adequate chance to implement it.”
Lukas Weirer, Obama SCTE Teacher
“Good
Evening President Miller, Directors of the Board, I want to start by saying that I appreciate how difficult this decision will be to make. At this time I am not in favor of a return to physical buildings this academic year for many of the reasons that have
already been discussed. This is not easy for me, especially since I just heard one of my students mom’s testify about how much she loves our school, but also that we are not able to meet her children’s needs virtually. That is what makes your decision so
difficult.
That
said, I wanted to spend my time tonight speaking to whether we are personally ready, as a district of educators, to return to our buildings, to meet the many needs of our students. I want to speak to the opportunity that we have as educators, when we return,
to change our personal practices, to change our school and classroom cultures in a way that is student-centered and in a way that promotes equitable spaces for all of our children, but that was not part of the plan. I want to be assured that if we come back,
we will return fundamentally changed. I want to be assured that we are collectively ready to do away with dehumanizing practices. This will take work and it goes well beyond a check-in circle each morning.
If
we are ready to radically transform how we teach our students, then and only then, should we consider a return to physical classrooms. There can be no rush to get back to normal when we consider the harm that normal was causing some of our students, families
and staff. I am suggesting that we need a new normal, and that we cannot even consider coming back until we are ready to prioritize healing and growth, as opposed to attendance and test scores. My question for the board is should we choose to go back to
the physical classroom this year, are we doing it for the right reasons? Are we doing it so we can say we covered more content, so we can meet some testing requirements, or so that we see an uptick in our attendance, or are we really doing this because we
are ready to show-up better for our students, families and community. I sincerely hope that by August and September when it is physically safe to return, we as educators in this district have made it mentally, emotionally, and intellectually safe for our
students to return as well. Thank You”
Mike VanPelt, Riverside H.S. Teacher
“President Miller, Members of the Committee, and MPS Administration:
Tonight you’ve heard (and will keep hearing) a continuing litany of issues regarding the Administration’s return plan this spring, both for and against. I’m not going to re-hash those issues, you can breathe a partial sigh of relief, but I am going to address some plan shortcomings as specifically applied to the high schools’ return details.
First, what is the actual schedule - Monday’s plan only gives 3 hours of instruction time but high schools teach four hours on Mondays whether on a period schedule or block scheduling. Later next week, teachers are supposed to be working on re-setting their rooms and curricula, but what happens to the students’ already-scheduled asynchronous learning sessions with their teachers? We’re not supposed to be working with students during the afternoons according to the plan. And are we supposed to continue with our other assigned professional responsibilities during asynchronous time next week?
As to resetting our curricula - if the students aren’t bringing anything including Chromebooks, does that mean Admin expects us to pivot completely off of a year’s worth of virtual curricula and return to paper and books - which by the way, the students also aren’t supposed to be given by the plan? And, when we DO come back after Spring break, are we going to a full-day virtual schedule until the students return physically, or staying with the split synchronous/asynchronous schedule? Again, not clear in the “plan.”
I’m a good soldier in a lot of ways - because I’m here to teach my kids. To keep their mental health and learning and needs in mind while teaching them my subject as well as how to “do life.” A big part of that training is how to plan ahead to be successful. What kind of example are we setting as a district and as teachers if we can’t even articulate what they are going to be doing as students next week?
High school students will need their Chromebooks daily. They’ll need teachers to complete their current curricula, as well as prepping the students for all the new return procedures and whatever kind of high stakes testing. We need a plan for the high schools. There isn’t enough of one right now to plan with.
I’ll leave you with one last thing: It’s Tornado Awareness Month. How do we do social distancing during a tornado drill?
President Miller, Members of the Committee, and MPS Administration:
Tonight you’ve heard (and will keep hearing) a continuing litany of issues regarding the Administration’s return plan this spring, both for and against. I’m not going to re-hash those issues, you can breathe a partial sigh of relief, but I am going to address some plan shortcomings as specifically applied to the high schools’ return details.
First, what is the actual schedule - Monday’s plan only gives 3 hours of instruction time but high schools teach four hours on Mondays whether on a period schedule or block scheduling. Later next week, teachers are supposed to be working on re-setting their rooms and curricula, but what happens to the students’ already-scheduled asynchronous learning sessions with their teachers? We’re not supposed to be working with students during the afternoons according to the plan. And are we supposed to continue with our other assigned professional responsibilities during asynchronous time next week?
As to resetting our curricula - if the students aren’t bringing anything including Chromebooks, does that mean Admin expects us to pivot completely off of a year’s worth of virtual curricula and return to paper and books - which by the way, the students also aren’t supposed to be given by the plan? And, when we DO come back after Spring break, are we going to a full-day virtual schedule until the students return physically, or staying with the split synchronous/asynchronous schedule? Again, not clear in the “plan.”
I’m a good soldier in a lot of ways - because I’m here to teach my kids. To keep their mental health and learning and needs in mind while teaching them my subject as well as how to “do life.” A big part of that training is how to plan ahead to be successful. What kind of example are we setting as a district and as teachers if we can’t even articulate what they are going to be doing as students next week?
High school students will need their Chromebooks daily. They’ll need teachers to complete their current curricula, as well as prepping the students for all the new return procedures and whatever kind of high stakes testing. We need a plan for the high schools. There isn’t enough of one right now to plan with.
I’ll leave you with one last thing: It’s Tornado Awareness Month. How do we do social distancing during a tornado drill?”
Milwaukee
Public Schools families overwhelmingly oppose returning to in-person
learning according to a survey the district recently conducted until
it’s safe to return and a vaccine is available. MTEA is deeply concerned
about the MPS “Roadmap to Readiness Update” reopening plans published
as attachments to the School Board agenda for tonight’s, Jan 26th SPB
Committee meeting.
Plan to watch tonight’s School Board meeting
and submit written testimony by 5pm, January 26th. Click the link below
for instructions on how to tune in and how to submit testimony. https://mps.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/…/School…/Boardcast.htm
Please reach out to your School Board members to make sure they understand that this plan is not safe.
TAKE ACTION!
Sign
& Share Our Public Petition: Make sure that you and your coworkers,
your family members, and friends have all signed the petition to the
MPS School Board. Please also share the link on social media. https://bit.ly/39rtDUu
Rationale: Septima Poinsette Clark was a Black American educator and civil rights activist. Clark developed the literacy and citizenship workshops that played an important role in the drive for voting rights and civil rights for African Americans in the Civil Rights Movement.
Educator Background (These are teacher resources to increase educator awareness of topics and to support in guiding discussion.):
What do you know about the Civil Rights movement? What were some of the challenges that Black people faced during the Civil Rights movement? How do you think children/students, families, and teachers reacted during that time? What challenges do people face today? How are children/students, families, and teachers reacting today?
Share and Reflect (whole class):
What do you see as an issue in school or your community? What do people need to know about this issue? How can you work on changing it?
Student Submission Write, Sketch, Express, Share
What do you see as an issue in school or your community? What do people need to know about this issue? How can you work on changing it?
Art, poetry, essay, group project submissions are due by Monday, January 25. Submit here.
*For this principle educators and students should go beyond learning about accepting differences. Awareness of Black people with disabilities and their contributions to society must be identified. Within the links provided are places to start.
Heather Watkins, a writer and disabled mom, had this to say about where our history fits and why it cannot be ignored:
Black Disability History matters to me a great deal because so many of our cultural icons have had disabilities, apparent and/or non-apparent as I’ve discovered. It more than likely factored in self-awareness, decision-making, and how they governed their lives. It’s an important factor that is often downplayed or gets erased in the retelling of their stories, if/when their stories get told at all. Black disability history is part of Black history which is American history. It needs to be chronicled and respected in the same manner we archive forebears who’ve richly contributed to the tapestry of our history and held with the same gleam and esteem. I didn’t learn about many disabled Black history-makers until I was well into adulthood and involved in advocacy. I imagine how it might’ve beneficially impacted my budding adolescent self-awareness knowing disability was part of their lived experience.
December Activity, International People’s with Disabilities Day
Principle(s)
Globalism and Collective Value
Rationale
December 3 is International People’s with Disabilities Day. Harriet Tubman, Fannie Lou Hamer are two disabled freedom fighters we revere, even as the disabilities they carried with them into struggle aren’t consistently lifted up as assets in their fight. To fight against societal ableism, we must celebrate our differences and understand how the lessons from Black disabled organizers teach us how to build inclusive, accessible movements.
Educator Background
(These are teacher resources to increase educator awareness of topics and to support in guiding discussion.)
Thinking about some of the Black activists we’ve learned about, how does it look when we accept people and work together?
Share and Reflect
(activity- individual or whole class)
K-12, What are you proud of that makes you different from others?
Student Submission
Write,Sketch,Express,Share- What are you proud of that makes you different from others?
Art, poetry, essay, video, group project submissions are due by Friday, December 18. Students can enter through this Google form: https://forms.gle/K4c7Ptekk79TWsYz8
National Resources
** Additional people you may wish to explore. It is important to pre-read the selections of the people highlighted. There are sensitive issues that you may want to leave out of the retelling with students.
Creating a Banner for #BlackLivesMatteratSchool Week by Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association (MTEA) Via Flickr: French Immersion students were busy Wednesday creating an all-school banner for the #BlackLivesMatterAtSchool national week of action. The completed banner will be used for an all school gathering with parents and community Friday. Nice works staff and students at French Immersion! Can’t wait to see the final product on Friday.
All phptos: Joe Brusky #BlackLivesMatter The National Black Lives Matter Week of Action in Our Schools
This Wednesday, Rufus King High School will be hosting a virtual #BlackHistoryShow at 7pm on Facebook Live. They sent us this powerful video excerpt of King Choir Director Mr. Lee Stovall perfoming “I Wish I Knew How it Feels to be Free” over a montage of photos MTEA took at #BlackLivesMatter actions happening across the city this last summer. Be sure to check out their Facebook page linked below on Wednesday.Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/rufuskinghighschool